Commentary on “Shared Truth”
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Truth, Logical Validity and Determinateness: a Commentary on field's Saving Truth from Paradox
We consider notions of truth and logical validity defined in various recent constructions of Hartry Field. We try to explicate his notion of determinate truth by clarifying the path dependent hierarchies of his determinateness operator. Hartry Field in a recent series of papers ([2],[3],[5] in [1]) has indicated how we might approach a theory of truth and associated semantic paradoxes, by provi...
متن کاملCommentary: getting at the truth about pathological lying.
Lying is common, and in its many aspects forms a normal part of social interchange. In this issue, Dike et al. review the literature on what has been referred to as pathological lying, highlighting the lack of information available about this phenomenon. In this commentary on Dike et al., it is noted that if pathological lying exists, it is not the lie, but the liar that is abnormal, with the a...
متن کاملCommentary: forensic education and the quest for truth.
Forensic psychiatry is the subspecialty that applies psychiatric knowledge to answering legal questions. There are ethics dilemmas inherent in its practice and in functioning at the interface of psychiatry and the law. The development of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL) Ethics Guidelines was an effort to assist forensic psychiatrists in dealing with these dilemmas and the m...
متن کاملRamsey on Truth and Truth on Ramsey
It is widely held, to the point of being the received interpretation, that Frank Ramsey was the first to defend the so-called Redundancy Theory of Truth in his landmark article ‘Facts and Propositions’ (hereafter ‘FP’) of 1927. For instance, A.J. Ayer cited this article in the context of arguing that saying that p is true is simply a way of asserting p and that truth is not a real quality or re...
متن کاملScharp on Replacing Truth
Kevin Scharp’s ‘Replacing Truth’ is an ambitious and far reaching account of the semantic paradoxes. In this critical discussion we examine one the books central claims: to have provided a theory of truth that avoids the revenge paradoxes. In the first part we assess this claim, and in the second part we investigate some features of Scharp’s preferred theory of truth, ADT, and compare it with e...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Academic Medicine
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1040-2446
DOI: 10.1097/01.acm.0000460551.66547.7c